SPY+0.99%QQQ+0.93%NVDA4.63%MSFT3.93%AAPL+0.44%GOOGL+9.96%META8.55%AMZN+0.77%TSLA+2.37%AVGO+2.95%SPY+0.99%QQQ+0.93%NVDA4.63%MSFT3.93%AAPL+0.44%GOOGL+9.96%META8.55%AMZN+0.77%TSLA+2.37%AVGO+2.95%
← all postsPerformance · 11 min read
performancethemesleaderboard

Best performing index funds of 2026 (and the themes driving them)

A clean look at the index funds that beat the S&P 500 in 2026 — semiconductors, sovereign AI infrastructure, defense, nuclear renaissance — with the underlying thesis, holdings, and 1Y/3Y/5Y/10Y returns vs SPX.

·11 min read·by Arithmos Research

Most “best index funds 2026” lists are republished SPY + QQQ posts. This one is different: every entry below links to a public, ready, rules-based Arithmos Research index with a 10-year backtest you can audit. We rank by 10-year CAGR, with Sharpe and max drawdown as guardrails — the names that actually beat the S&P 500 in 2026, and the underlying thesis driving them.

Methodology + caveats

  • Universe: every official Arithmos Research index with a complete 10-year backtest as of May 2026.
  • Benchmark: S&P 500 (SPX), total return.
  • Ranking: 10Y CAGR, with Sharpe ratio and max drawdown shown alongside.
  • Backtests use Financial Modeling Prep daily prices (Yahoo + Tiingo as fallbacks).
  • Past performance does not guarantee future results — this is research, not advice.

The 2026 leaderboard

#Index10Y CAGRSharpeMax DD
1AI Core 3+53.5%1.17−31%
2Semiconductors US & Taiwan+52.6%1.05−60%
3Sovereign AI Infrastructure+49.7%1.04−56%
4Magnificent 7 Equal-Weight+44.0%1.15−30%
5Semiconductor Equipment Oligopoly+31.9%0.79−55%
6China EV & Battery Monopoly+31.3%0.58−66%
7Consumer Platform Monopoly+23.4%0.79−44%
8Generational Wealth Transfer+19.9%0.33−71%
9American Reshoring+18.9%0.70−46%
10Defence-AI Convergence+18.2%0.54−46%
SPY (S&P 500 baseline)~12.6%~0.55~−24%

Themes that drove outperformance

1. AI infrastructure

The biggest wealth-creation event of the decade. Hyperscaler capex on NVIDIA GPUs, Vertiv cooling, and Constellation nuclear power compounded faster than any thematic ETF could keep up with.

2. Concentrated mega-cap tech

Equal-weighted Magnificent 7 (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, NVDA, TSLA) crushed broad market-cap indices. The discipline of quarterly equal-weight rebalancing harvested gains from the winners and topped up the laggards.

3. Reshoring / industrial renaissance

CHIPS Act + IRA funding plus de-globalization tailwinds re-rated US industrial names like Caterpillar, Cummins, Deere, Quanta Services, and Vulcan Materials.

4. Defense + AI convergence

Pentagon software contracts moving toward AI-native vendors (Palantir, Leidos, Booz Allen) lifted defense-tech indices meaningfully above traditional aerospace ETFs.

Themes that didn’t outpace SPY

  • GLP-1 obesity boom — pulled back ~16% in 2026 after a frothy 2024–25.
  • Psychedelic medicine — clinical setbacks; 10Y CAGR negative.
  • Quantum computing — huge volatility; outsize 1Y returns but lumpy multi-year track record.
  • Space economy — Rocket Lab carrying the basket; Virgin Galactic and others detracted.

How to actually own one

Three options:

  • Buy the ETFs in the same neighborhood (SOXX for semis, SMH for chip giants, XAR for defense). Cleanest if you want a wrapper.
  • Own the holdings directly via Arithmos. Click any index above, hit “Export to broker,” pick your brokerage format. Lower fees, tax-loss harvesting, full control.
  • Build a custom variant. Swap holdings, change weights, set a different rebalance cadence. Type the change in plain English and Arithmos updates the spec.

Why rebalance cadence matters

A common misread: people compare an annual-rebalance index against a quarterly-rebalance index without controlling for the cadence. Equal-weight indices in particular benefit hugely from frequent rebalancing because it harvests winners systematically. Monthly rebalancing on a hot mega-cap basket can add 200–400 bps a year over the same names left alone.

FAQ

Did anyone really beat the S&P 500 by this much?

Yes — but those returns came from concentrated thematic exposure, which carries materially higher drawdown risk. The trade-off is explicit and the backtests show it.

What’s the cheapest way to own these?

Direct ownership via a basket export at a zero-commission broker. Arithmos charges a flat subscription, not a fund expense ratio.

How often does the leaderboard change?

We refresh backtests daily (cached for 24h). Underlying prices come from FMP. Ranks shift in real time.

Should I just buy the top-ranked index?

Not without sizing it appropriately. The top names also have the biggest drawdowns. A 70/30 split (SPY + thematic) usually beats 100% in either direction over a full cycle.

Build this yourself

Arithmos turns a sentence into a transparent, rule-based index with institutional-grade backtests. Describe the exposure you want — “profitable AI picks-and-shovels, no Chinese issuers”, “UK dividend aristocrats” — and the agent picks the names, assigns weights, and runs a 10-year simulation.

Keep reading

Arithmos · a research tool · not financial advice · past performance does not guarantee future results.
Research tool · not financial advice · past performance does not guarantee future results.